For several decades, the United States’ trade and agricultural policies have profoundly affected Haiti’s farming sector, converting what was once a self-reliant nation into one heavily reliant on international assistance.
A comprehensive investigation by PBS News underscores the severe ramifications of American policy decisions on Haiti’s economic landscape, with particular emphasis on its agricultural industry.
The transformation began in 1986 when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) extended substantial loans to Haiti, contingent upon a significant reduction in import duties. Simultaneously, as PBS News emphasized, the U.S. government implemented extensive subsidies for American rice producers, enabling them to export their produce at unbeatable prices. “American trade policies forced the Haitian government to lower tariffs on foreign goods, allowing U.S. farmers to export their crops at low prices, but making it impossible for Haitians to consume locally produced food,” PBS News revealed in its special report on Haiti.
The consequences were catastrophic for Haiti’s rice farming community. American rice, nicknamed “Miami rice,” inundated the market at prices so low that domestic producers found it impossible to maintain their business. Albert Pierre Joseph, whose father was a rice farmer, shared his experience: “The reduction in rice tariffs during my childhood affected me a lot. My father could no longer sell his rice at a price that allowed us to meet our needs,” he said, expressing his distress over the situation.
Bill Clinton: A Late Regret
In 1994, during President Bill Clinton’s tenure, a fresh agreement further slashed Haiti’s import tariffs from 35% to a mere 3%. This decision, though presented as a strategy to industrialize Haiti, yielded contrary results, as former U.S. President Bill Clinton attempted to explain in footage shown during PBS News’ comprehensive report. Fifteen years later, Bill Clinton publicly acknowledged this error, stating: “Since 1981, the United States has followed a policy that the rich countries, which produce a lot of food, should sell it to poor countries and relieve them from the burden of producing their own food. It didn’t work… It was a mistake,” Bill Clinton admitted. This belated recognition came too late for a nation crippled by American policies and other international interventions. Despite President Donald Trump’s current administration, attempts to implement more protective measures for Haitian agriculture have proven unsuccessful, and American rice continues to dominate the market.
The ramifications of these policies extended far beyond economic consequences. The dietary habits of Haitians underwent a dramatic transformation. Rice, previously consumed two to three times weekly, has become a daily dietary staple, PBS News reported, referencing a University of Michigan study that identified concerning levels of arsenic in American rice—levels that could potentially trigger cancers and learning disabilities with frequent consumption. “How do you feel when you know you’re consuming arsenic?” questioned a farmer in his interview with PBS News. This query remains unanswered, as addressing the destructive policies affecting local Haitian production appears to be of little concern to U.S. authorities. “A great effort is needed both nationally and internationally, because not only do we not produce enough food, but the food we import makes people sick,” pleaded the farmer.
Food Aid: A Vicious Cycle
In a twist of irony, international assistance, designed to combat hunger, perpetuates Haiti’s dependency. U.S. food aid partially arrives as “in-kind goods”—food produced in America and transported to Haiti. These distributions create additional challenges for local producers, who struggle to compete with freely distributed goods.
Thomas Deville, director of the World Food Program in Haiti, explains: “We would prefer to source 100% locally, but Haiti is not yet self-sufficient. It takes time to reach such a level, as well as capacity-building programs and investments in agricultural infrastructure.”
A Policy That Benefits American Interests
While Haiti receives minimal benefit from food aid, certain American entities prosper. Legislation from the 1950s requires that half of all food aid be transported via U.S.-flagged vessels. An American Enterprise Institute study reveals this requirement costs approximately 50 million dollars yearly—funds that could potentially feed one to two million additional people worldwide.
Stephanie Mercier, former chief economist for the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee, explains: “The big winners of this policy are the American maritime transport companies, who charge rates that are at least 60% higher than those of foreign carriers.”
Under President Donald Trump’s current administration, conditions have deteriorated further. His temporary suspension of international aid at the start of his term intensified Haiti’s food crisis. Moreover, the Trump administration maintains agricultural policies favoring American exporters while disadvantaging Haitian farmers.
Haiti remains ensnared in a system that strips away its food sovereignty, political autonomy, and economic development opportunities, while simultaneously enriching specific American economic interests, as reported by PBS News in its comprehensive coverage of Haiti’s political, economic, and social landscape.
Be the Voice Behind the Stories – Donate to CTN Today!
Be the Voice Behind the Stories – Donate to CTN Today!
